Charter School Facility Center Advisory Board

Former credit rating analyst Liz Sweeney outlines recommendations for charter schools to maximize interactions with rating agencies. 

As the charter school sector continues to grow and mature, municipal bond ratings from Wall Street’s big credit rating agencies including S&P Global RatingsMoody’s, and Fitch Ratings are increasingly within reach. Charter schools are still unlikely to achieve the high ratings typical of bonds issued by essential public service entities and enterprises such as local governments, public school districts, and water utilities — rating agencies and investors still consider the charter sector largely a “high yield” sector, meaning that most schools are generally non-investment grade credits. However, established charter schools and charter management organizations (CMOs) with strong demand, good management, high academic standards, stable financial performance, and at least one charter renewal under their belts are increasingly able to achieve low investment grade (‘BBB’ category) or high speculative grade (‘BB’) ratings. These organizations often find that the credibility of an independent credit rating results in strong investor demand and a lower cost of capital than other financing sources.

While a lower cost of capital is great news, coming face-to-face with credit rating agencies is a stressful and intimidating experience. Here’s the good news: whether you are a new charter school debt issuer dealing with a rating agency for the first time, or you have long-standing established relationships with rating agencies, there are a few simple ways you can maximize your interactions with them, reduce the anxiety of the rating process, and maybe even nab a higher rating.

Click to read the rest of the article: How Charter School Debt Issuers Can Ace Rating Agency Interviews

Date published